EU13172013
|
ID： |
10D51B340C0B41DE900A460459F4F65F |
|
文件大小(MB)： |
0.7 |
|
页数： |
43 |
|
文件格式： |
|
|
日期： |
2014-9-11 |
|
购买： |
文本摘录（文本识别可能有误，但文件阅览显示及打印正常，pdf文件可进行文字搜索定位）：
II,(Non-legislative acts),REGULATIONS,COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) No 1317/2013,of 16 December 2013,amending Annexes II, III and V to Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards maximum residue levels for 2,4-D, beflubutamid, cyclanilide, diniconazole, florasulam, metolachlor and S-metolachlor, and milbemectin in or on certain products,(Text with EEA relevance),THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 February 2005 on maximum residue levels of pesticides in or on food and feed of plant and animal origin and amending Council Directive 91/414/EEC ( 1 ), and in particular Article 14(1)(a), Article 18(1)(b) and Article 49(2) thereof,Whereas:,(1) For 2,4-D, cyclanilide, florasulam, metolachlor and S- metolachlor, and milbemectin, maximum residue levels (MRLs) are set in Annex II and Part B of Annex III to Regulation (EC) No 396/2005. For beflubutamid and diniconazole, MRLs are set in Part A of Annex III to that Regulation.,(2) Certain technical adaptations should be made, in particular the name of the active substance 'metholachlor and metholachlor-S' should be replaced by 'metolachlor and S-metolachlor'.,(3) For 2,4-D, the European Food Safety Authority, hereinafter "the Authority", submitted a reasoned opinion on the existing MRLs in accordance with Article 12(2) of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 in conjunction with Article 12(1) thereof ( 2 ). The Authority proposed to change the residue definition. It recommended raising or keeping the existing MRLs for certain products. It concluded that concerning the MRLs for almonds, brazil nuts, cashew nuts, coconuts, hazelnuts, macadamia, pecans, pine nuts, pistachios, walnuts, soya bean and buckwheat grain some information was not available and that further consideration by risk managers was required. As there is no risk for consumers, MRLs for those products should be set in Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 at the existing level or the level identified by the Authority. Those MRLs will be reviewed; the review will take into account the information available within two years from the publication of this Regulation.,(4) For beflubutamid, the Authority submitted a reasoned opinion on the existing MRLs in accordance with Article 12(2) of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 in conjunction with Article 12(1) thereof ( 3 ). It recommended lowering the MRL for wheat grain. For other products it recommended keeping the existing MRLs.,(5) For cyclanilide, the Authority submitted a reasoned opinion on the existing MRLs in accordance with Article 12(2) of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 in conjunction with Article 12(1) thereof ( 4 ). It recommended raising the existing MRL for cotton seed.EN 17.12.2013 Official Journal of the European Union L 339/1,( 1 ) OJ L 70, 16.3.2005, p. 1.,( 2 ) European Food Safety Authority; Review of the existing maximum residue levels (MRLs) for 2,4-D according to Article 12 of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005. EFSA Journal 2011;9(11):2431. [52 pp.],( 3 ) European Food Safety Authority; Review of the existing maximum residue levels (MRLs) for beflubutamid according to Article 12 of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005. EFSA Journal 2012;10(2):2585. [28 pp.],( 4 ) European Food Safety Authority; Review of the existing maximum residue levels (MRLs) for cyclanilide according to Article 12 of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005. EFSA Journal 2012;10(2):2568. [27 pp.],However, as the approval of the active substance cyclanilide expired on 31 October 2011 ( 1 ) and all existing authorisations for plant protection products containing cyclanilide have been revoked, it is appropriate to set the MRLs at the specific limit of determination.,(6) For diniconazole, the Authority submitted a reasoned opinion on the existing MRLs in accordance with Article 12(1) of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 ( 2 ). It proposed to change the residue definition. All existing authorisations for plant protection products containing diniconazole-M have been revoked. It is therefore appropriate to set the MRLs at the specific limit of determination.,(7) For florasulam, the Authority submitted a reasoned opinion on the existing MRLs in accordance with Article 12(2) of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 in conjunction with Article 12(1) thereof ( 3 ). It recommended keeping the existing MRLs for certain products. It concluded that concerning the MRLs for meat, fat, liver and kidney of bovine animals, sheep and goat, as well as for cattle milk, sheep milk and goat milk some information was not available and t……
……