EU612014
|
ID： |
3E7C50E66C1047E782CC2D4BF219EDCE |
|
文件大小(MB)： |
0.65 |
|
页数： |
32 |
|
文件格式： |
|
|
日期： |
2014-9-12 |
|
购买： |
文本摘录（文本识别可能有误，但文件阅览显示及打印正常，pdf文件可进行文字搜索定位）：
II,(Non-legislative acts),REGULATIONS,COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) No 61/2014,of 24 January 2014,amending Annexes II and III to Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards maximum residue levels for cyromazine, fenpropidin, formetanate, oxamyl and tebuconazole in or on certain products,(Text with EEA relevance),THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 February 2005 on maximum residue levels of pesticides in or on food and feed of plant and animal origin and amending Council Directive 91/414/EEC ( 1 ), and in particular Article 14(1)(a) and Article 49(2) thereof,Whereas:,(1) For cyromazine and oxamyl, maximum residue levels (MRLs) were set in Annex II and Part B of Annex III to Regulation (EC) No 396/2005. For fenpropidin, formetanate and tebuconazole, MRLs were set in Part A of Annex III to that Regulation.,(2) For cyromazine, the European Food Safety Authority, hereinafter ‘the Authority’, submitted a reasoned opinion on the existing MRLs in accordance with Article 12(1) of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 ( 2 ). The Authority recommended lowering the MRLs for tomatoes and aubergines. For other products it recommended raising the MRLs.,(3) The Authority concluded that concerning the MRLs for cyromazine in lamb’s lettuce, lettuce, rocket, rucola, beans (fresh with pods), peas (fresh with pods) and celery some information was not available and that further consideration by risk managers was required. As there is no risk for consumers, MRLs for those products should be set in Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 at the existing level or the level identified by the Authority. Those MRLs will be reviewed; the review will take into account the information available within two years from the publication of this Regulation.,(4) The Authority concluded that concerning the MRLs for cyromazine in fresh herbs no information was available and that further consideration by risk managers was required. Taking into account additional information on the good agricultural practices provided by the Netherlands and as there is no risk for consumers, MRLs for those products should be set in Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 at the existing level. Those MRLs will be reviewed; the review will take into account the information available within two years from the publication of this Regulation.,(5) The Authority indicated that the evaluated use for cyromazine in escarole may raise concerns of consumer protection. The MRL for that product should be set at the specific limit of determination or at the default MRL as set out in Article 18(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005.EN 25.1.2014 Official Journal of the European Union L 22/1,( 1 ) OJ L 70, 16.3.2005, p. 1.,( 2 ) European Food Safety Authority; Review of the existing maximum residue levels (MRLs) for cyromazine according to Article 12 of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005. EFSA Journal 2011;9(7):2326. [52 pp.],(6) Cyromazine is a pharmacologically active substance in veterinary medicine. As regards ovine products, MRLs for those products should be set at the same level as provided for in Commission Regulation (EU) No 37/2010 ( 1 ) because exposure from use in veterinary medicinal products is expected to be higher than from use in plant protection products.,(7) For fenpropidin, the Authority submitted a reasoned opinion on the existing MRLs in accordance with Article 12(1) of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 ( 2 ). It proposed to change the residue definition. It recommended lowering the MRLs for bananas, oats, rye, wheat and sugar beet root. For other products it recommended raising or keeping the existing MRLs.,(8) For formetanate, the Authority submitted a reasoned opinion on the existing MRLs in accordance with Article 12(2) of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 in conjunction with Article 12(1) thereof ( 3 ). It recommended keeping the existing MRL for tomatoes.,(9) The Authority concluded that concerning the MRLs for formetanate in melons and watermelons some information was not available and that further consideration by risk managers was required. As there is no risk for consumers, MRLs for those products should be set in Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 at the existing level or the level identified by the Authority.,(10) The Authority concluded that concerning the MRLs for formetanate in table and wine grapes, strawberries, peppers, cucumbers, beans with pods, leek and courgettes no information was available and that further consideration by risk managers was ……
……